We're now re-rehearsing Winter. Our former Princess, Margarita Musto, has gone off to become head of the Comedia Nacional. So Carlos has a new princess, Natalia Bolani. A different actress brings other qualities to the role. In addition, the style of the piece alters slightly, with a new more naturalistic emphasis, perhaps.
The last word is there because as yet, a month away from the production, there's still much that is unknown about how the production will finally look and feel.
The process of re-rehearsing Winter has been, at times, bewildering. Having worked on it last year, one would assume that basically, the director knows the play well. Second time round should be easier. However, in practice, it's been the opposite. It's almost as though, the more you know the play, the more difficult it becomes. This has to do with the layers of precision and meaning inherent in the text. I realise this might sound like a cliché, but to my mind, my role feels as much like that of a conductor of an orchestra as a director. The words, silences and movements are notes. The performers are a range of instruments, their voices, bodies, attitudes all contributing to the play's interpretation. As with music, it is the false notes that have to be first heard and then tackled. The narrative does not really allow for the actor to merely enter the flow of the piece with their actions conditioned by the characters' desires or 'motivation'. Because these things are shape-shifting, fragile, paradoxical. As in life, characters want more than one thing at the same time. And those things might well be entirely contradictory.
Perhaps this is the root of the play's difficulty. This fact of constant equivocation. The woman wants the man but at the same time she doesn't want the package. The man doesn't know what he wants, but at the same time he knows what he doesn't want. This is the way real people think. Nothing is black and white. The words and the characters are like spinning molecules, which we try and trap in a form and stasis that works, only to find they keep spinning, and that which works in one moment doesn't in the next.
As a result the process of rehearsal is exhausting, delirious. The more you know about the play, the more it seems to slip through your fingers. I'm not sure if I'm doing credit to the process in what I'm writing here. As a director, I don't think I've ever felt as challenged by a text as I have been this time, specifically by the second round of doing it. This means that the direction is hard work. Every beat, every word, has to be accounted for, has to work within the music of the text. It's also a highly satisfying, joyful process. The piece demands and rewards input. The actors can never coast and neither can the director. The words spin and fly around the room like butterflies. We try and catch them in our nets for a moment, before releasing them to return and play the following day.
The last word is there because as yet, a month away from the production, there's still much that is unknown about how the production will finally look and feel.
The process of re-rehearsing Winter has been, at times, bewildering. Having worked on it last year, one would assume that basically, the director knows the play well. Second time round should be easier. However, in practice, it's been the opposite. It's almost as though, the more you know the play, the more difficult it becomes. This has to do with the layers of precision and meaning inherent in the text. I realise this might sound like a cliché, but to my mind, my role feels as much like that of a conductor of an orchestra as a director. The words, silences and movements are notes. The performers are a range of instruments, their voices, bodies, attitudes all contributing to the play's interpretation. As with music, it is the false notes that have to be first heard and then tackled. The narrative does not really allow for the actor to merely enter the flow of the piece with their actions conditioned by the characters' desires or 'motivation'. Because these things are shape-shifting, fragile, paradoxical. As in life, characters want more than one thing at the same time. And those things might well be entirely contradictory.
Perhaps this is the root of the play's difficulty. This fact of constant equivocation. The woman wants the man but at the same time she doesn't want the package. The man doesn't know what he wants, but at the same time he knows what he doesn't want. This is the way real people think. Nothing is black and white. The words and the characters are like spinning molecules, which we try and trap in a form and stasis that works, only to find they keep spinning, and that which works in one moment doesn't in the next.
As a result the process of rehearsal is exhausting, delirious. The more you know about the play, the more it seems to slip through your fingers. I'm not sure if I'm doing credit to the process in what I'm writing here. As a director, I don't think I've ever felt as challenged by a text as I have been this time, specifically by the second round of doing it. This means that the direction is hard work. Every beat, every word, has to be accounted for, has to work within the music of the text. It's also a highly satisfying, joyful process. The piece demands and rewards input. The actors can never coast and neither can the director. The words spin and fly around the room like butterflies. We try and catch them in our nets for a moment, before releasing them to return and play the following day.